Skip to main content

 

Justice or Judgement?

Trial Attorney Anne Bremner, says we are living in an age of judgements rather than justice. Her book ‘Justice in the Age of Judgment’ examines trials in recent history heralding a new era of trying cases in public as much as the courtroom.

This is not a new phenomenon. The trial by the British Raj of the Karachi Seven at Khalikdina Hall in 1921 was a very public affair and reported daily in the press.  Medieval Inquisition trials conducted across Europe were held in secret but punishments were public including the burning at the stake of women accused of witchcraft. The Sufi Mansur Hallaj after being confined for 11 years was brutally executed in public. Why are people so keen to see justice being done?  Is it an assurance for a safer future? Is it to be reminded of the limits imposed by society?

While courts make judgements, the question may be raised: was justice done? Doing the right thing is justice, while a judgment is the decision of the court based on arguments presented. Judgements can be perverse (iudicium perversum), or rash (iudicium temerarium). Compassion and forgiveness are an essential part of justice, while court judgements follow prescribed laws.

Seeking justice for others is seen as a moral obligation. There is however the danger that mobilising the oppressed to seek justice, may make them into the oppressors they condemn. The idiom "judge, jury, and executioner" originally a necessity in the remote wild west of America, is now a phrase that suggests the denial of the due process of justice. In Islam the burden of proof is placed on the accuser and a person is presumed innocent until proved guilty. As Jesus Christ said when the people were about to stone a woman for adultery, ‘let he who has not sinned cast the first stone’ at which all stepped back. 

Philosophers from ancient times to today have debated the true nature of justice. In all religions it is a divine command. There is no justice in nature – only adaptability. Justice seems to be a purely human concern. John Rawls says "Justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of thought." Al Kindi regards Justice as central and above all human virtues, and embodies the task given to humans as the representatives or khalifah of Allah, to implement Adl on earth.

Justice or al-adl’ in Islam means placing something in its rightful place, bringing back the equilibrium – the mizan. Everyone is responsible and answerable for his actions. Adl holds society together and transforms it into one brotherhood, where each is responsible for the welfare of all. Plato similarly says justice is about balance and harmony, important for the smooth functioning of society and for equality.  Taoist sage Lao Tzu stated ‘When the original harmony was lost, laws arose.’ Human intervention by formulating laws was needed to restore harmony.

The belief in resurrection on the day of judgement in Islam brings a more subtle question: can one be unjust to one self? The soul will not be able to deny what its body had done -  its eyes, tongue, hands and feet will testify its acts of injustice to itself. Wronging another is really wronging the self.

But man’s judgements have always fallen short.  Seeking justice is different from doing justice. There have been some bizarre trials. Pope Formosus was taken out of his grave, dressed in his robes and tried and judged in a court. Socrates had to pay the price with his life for the actions of his students, the Thirty Tyrants of Athens. In everyday life, journalists judge people and state policies. Artists judge society, such as the paintings of Otto Dix or Rashid Rana, and then society judges the artist. Manto was judged for judging society. 

Women are probably the most judged members of society. Ironic given that justice is always represented by a woman from the first known symbol of justice – the Egyptian goddess Maat, to the Roman goddess Justitia. The symbol has persisted to our times, holding the scales of balance in one hand and the sword of enforcement in the other. The image of justice being blindfolded first appeared in a statue by the Swiss sculptor Hans Gieng in 1543. Originally a satirical comment to show Justice as blind to the injustice carried on before her, it was later reinterpreted as impartiality.

Establishing justice is not a comfortable act even if its intention is to redress an imbalance.

 

Durriya Kazi

September 3, 2024

Karachi

 durriyakazi1918@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decorated Trucks of Pakistan

International Institute for Asian Studies / Association for Asian Studies / Asia Committee, European Science Foundation First International Convention of Asia Scholars Leeuenhorst Conference Centre, Noordwijkerhout , Netherlands , 25-28 June, 1998 Panel: “ Shaking the Tree: New Approaches to Asian Art” / Session: Decorated Transport Decorated Trucks of Pakistan Durriya Kazi June 1998. Karachi Meaning is always in process, what has been called “a momentary stop in a continuing flow of interpretations of interpretations”. This paper pauses at some facts and some observations about decorated trucks of Pakistan , a subject that has elicited tantalisingly few studies. Pakistan is often presented geographically and thus historically as the corridor of land between the mountain passes that separated the near East from the plains of India . Less mentioned and more significant is its identity as the valley of the River Indus which has historically ...
  How Much is Enough? Most discussions about what is considered ‘enough’ centre around money and power. To be the most powerful, the wealthiest or the most famous, once the desire of mighty kings and despots, has now filtered down in modern societies, with rags to riches stories becoming commonplace. However, the modern world is increasingly characterised by insatiability, an inability to say “enough is enough”, and an insatiable desire for more money or power. Enough means having enough to live, enough to be happy, and enough to thrive. So how does one arrive at what is enough? Enough is not a number. Individuals have their own measure of enough. The wise know what that limit is, for others, society’s limiting systems — legal or moral — determine when enough is enough. King Ashoka won a battle against the Kalinga kingdom, with 100,000 deaths and even more taken captive. That was his ‘enough’. Appalled by his own ruthlessness, Ashoka became a Buddhist, dedicated to spreading th...
  ‘o Travelling Together or Going Our Separate Ways We live, and have lived for centuries, in a politically and economically divided world.   Unable to accept these differences, there is always one group that takes the further step of dominating another. The most direct way is for a stronger group to take over a weaker group by sheer force. Where the two forces are equally matched, subterfuge, divide et imperia – divide and rule, is effective. Sometimes all it takes is cultural seduction. Something as innocuous as blue jeans became an important symbol of the Free West during the Cold War. Bruce Springsteen told the East Berlin youth in a July 1988 concert “I’m not here for any government. I’ve come to play rock ‘n’ roll for you in the hope that one day all the barriers will be torn down.”   History books are filled with the constant constructing and dismantling of alliances, based on the perceived enemy of the moment. All the great wars in Europe, India and China ...