Knowledge and Knowing
"To attain knowledge, add things every
day. To attain wisdom, remove things every day." — Lao Tzu.
Knowledge is information acquired from
external sources. Knowing, on the other hand, emerges from within and
determines how facts are comprehended. Knowledge has no value without knowing
while knowing can exist without knowledge.
A child knows how to recognise parents,
communicate and play without any formal instructions. Village wisdom knows the
right time to sow plants, or cure with herbs, without knowledge of botany or
biology, relying on collective memory and connection to nature. Most of us know how to change a light bulb or
operate a computer without knowledge of how electricity if produced or how
binary technology works.
In Europe knowledge gained priority over
knowing around the scientific revolution of the 17th C establishing
rational knowledge as superior to subjective experience. Other civilisations
such as those of India or the Muslim world, continued to see both knowledge and
knowing as deeply connected.
The very first Quranic verse revealed was
about the centrality of knowledge to human existence: Allah taught by the pen, taught man that
which he knew not. Yet the Truth could only be understood by intuitive knowing,
what the Sufis called Ma’arif.
Socrates believed true knowledge is not
passively absorbed from the outside world, but is a recollection or anamnesis. The
immortal soul possesses all universal truths, but forgets them upon birth. Learning
is the recognition of what was already known. Ibn e Arabi formalised this with
his concept of stages of knowledge by four Qalams or pens. He also says Ilm al Yaqin
or knowing something through the proof of logic, is the first stage of
Knowledge. The final stage is Haqq al-Yaqin - knowing through experience.
The Greeks distinguished between episteme
or knowledge, and gnosis or intuitive knowing. In medicine the terms diagnosis
and prognosis, based on educated intuition, carry the suffix –gnosis.
Over the years, knowledge gained importance
as the foundation of rationality, science and technology – the needs of the
modern industrial era. Knowing was relegated to the margins, the subject of
religion and spirituality, the arts or village wisdom. Knowledge became commodified, structured and
prescribed– an essential element of intellectual superiority, educational
systems and public policy.
Until the arrival of internet search
engines in the 1990s, there were only human search engines called librarians, or
book shop owners. Knowledge was accessed by scholars, academics or the
educated. It was a slow considered
process. Today knowledge is itemised. A Google search retrieves and ranks the
best results, sometimes numbering in the hundreds of thousands, in less than a
second. In the last two years, AI generated articles have surpassed human-authored
writing, suggesting knowledge is simply accessing what has already been
written.
Europe historically managed knowledge to
project political and economic power, establishing regulatory institutions in
every imaginable field, as benchmarks for global standards. Post-colonial
Europe gradually lost its role as the central global trading hub. Its 21st century strategy is "Europe of
Knowledge”, investing in higher education, data management and research.
Knowledge which
was once a universal human endeavour shared across civilisations, took on a
political dimension. The term ‘Knowledge
Power Europe’ was coined by Professor Michael Young to underline the importance
of knowledge to EU’s foreign policy and global relevance. It was to become a
cultural filter, establish intellectual leadership, act as a coercive tool to persuade
others to follow its regulatory regimes. The Lisbon Strategy (2000) set a goal
of making Europe the ‘most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in
the world’, an integral part of geopolitical objectives. It is seen as epistemic
colonialism -the systematic imposition of Eurocentric knowledge systems,
values, and worldviews to overwrite indigenous or local ways of knowing.
The world is bracing for a seismic
political transformation. It would be incomplete without intellectual
transformation. T.S Eliot, in his poem, Little Gidding written in 1942, in the
midst of WWII, longs for the flames of destruction to fold back. “For last year's words belong to last year's
language/And next year's words await another voice.” He vows:
“We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our
exploring
Will be to arrive where
we started
And know the place for
the first time”
Durriya Kazi
May 30, 2026
Karachi
Comments
Post a Comment