Skip to main content

 

Do We Need to Explain Art?

 Love, Faith and Art are enigmas that have occupied philosophers, psychologists and ordinary people  from the earliest civilizations, and continue to fill pages with inconclusive speculation. Those who are in love, who have strong faith or who create art know what they feel , but words seem to sidestep the essence of their emotions. 

The artist Georges Braque said “There is only one valuable thing in art: the thing you cannot explain.” Yet humans are restless for certainty, always looking for the meaning of everything experienced or encountered.  Any explanation, simple or complex, keeps a sense of chaos at bay.

Picasso wrote in some frustration: “Everyone wants to understand art. Why not try to understand the song of a bird? Why does one love the night, flowers, everything around one, without trying to understand them? But in the case of a painting people have to understand.”

The Modern movement in art generated an ever-confusing abundance of art works that challenge our notions of art that are based on classical art. There are more and more pressures today on artists to explain themselves.

Art Critics and art historians were the intermediary between the artist and the audience, sometimes powerful in making or breaking artists. However, as they grappled with the waywardness of modern art, and artists themselves were in the throes of challenging norms and experimenting, both artists and critics turned to art theorists and philosophers - Derrida, Barthes, Lacan, Foucault, Baudrillard or Lyotard, creating new terminologies, known by sceptics as “art jargon”,  that requires the viewer to also familiarize themselves with these theories.

The ordinary viewer deprived of the intermediary “explainer” of art, is left to wander in art galleries asking the question “what is the artist trying to say?” forced to make their own conclusions.

Artist and Art writer Jakob Zaaiman suggests artworks could be better understood if seen through the storytelling associated with Art Cinema, rather than  comparisons with classical art. We should walk out of a gallery having felt something rather than understood something.   The viewer is given the power, as Roland Barthes acknowledges, to make final sense of the work.

This is true also of classical art which we greatly value, often unaware of the original intentions of the artist. Renaissance art is filled with symbols that would have been known to people of that time, but are lost on us. Colours, flowers, animals, fruit and objects each had a symbolism that the viewer of the time would have understood.  Vanitas, a genre of Dutch painting, appear to be exquisite still life paintings, but are filled with symbols warning the viewer of the transience of life and the corruption of worldly possessions - flowers whose petals are falling, a violin with broken strings,  a dead fish. 

Most artists are not concerned with the viewer knowing their personal reasons for making an artwork, preferring to let the viewer find their own emotional connection.  Francis Bacon said “The job of the artist is always to deepen the mystery”.  That most enigmatic of artists Marcel Duchamp said “As soon as we start putting our thoughts into words and sentences everything gets distorted, language is just no damn good—I use it because I have to, but I don’t put any trust in it.”

The mathematician George Boole tried to explain the nature of God using algebraic formulae. Scientists try to explain love as the release of endorphins and dopamine, but as Rumi says about love, which applies equally to Faith and Art

“Love cannot be explained.

Love can only be experienced.

Love cannot be explained,

Yet love explains everything.”

 

Durriya Kazi

March 1, 2021

durriyakazi1918@gmail.com

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decorated Trucks of Pakistan

International Institute for Asian Studies / Association for Asian Studies / Asia Committee, European Science Foundation First International Convention of Asia Scholars Leeuenhorst Conference Centre, Noordwijkerhout , Netherlands , 25-28 June, 1998 Panel: “ Shaking the Tree: New Approaches to Asian Art” / Session: Decorated Transport Decorated Trucks of Pakistan Durriya Kazi June 1998. Karachi Meaning is always in process, what has been called “a momentary stop in a continuing flow of interpretations of interpretations”. This paper pauses at some facts and some observations about decorated trucks of Pakistan , a subject that has elicited tantalisingly few studies. Pakistan is often presented geographically and thus historically as the corridor of land between the mountain passes that separated the near East from the plains of India . Less mentioned and more significant is its identity as the valley of the River Indus which has historically ...
What have we done to our youth? At this year’s Art and Design degree show at the University of Karachi I was taken aback by the darkness that lies within the sweet looking cheerful young men and women graduating this year. There is always a degree of emotional turmoil that is expressed through art. However, this year’s work shook me to the core and I asked myself, what have we done to our youth?       Despair, depression, suicidal thoughts, a childhood of abuse, night terrors, stray dogs, gender labels were transformed into beautiful artworks, but reflected a deep anxiety. Art is a natural vehicle for personal expression. How many of those hundred million or so young Pakistanis have similar anxieties that are never heard? Have we disempowered our youth? Youth the world over are struggling to be heard. Malala Yusufzai for education, Greta Thunberg and the Friday school strikes for climate, March for Our Lives for gun control.  At the ages of 17 and ...
  Patterns of Infinity If we probe deeper into any phenomena – astronomy, the cycle of life, mathematics, we arrive at the concept of infinity. It is the most abstract of abstractions, although mathematicians have tried to devise ways to measure and rationalize infinity. Trying to make sense of the infinite is a bit like trying to contain the uncontainable. Contemplating infinity inevitably led all civilizations and all religions to the concept of God.   The art of most religions express God as an image or a symbol, perhaps to make it more accessible to devotees, leaving it to the philosophers to come to terms with the nature of infinity. The exception is Islamic Art, which from its earliest expressions of Quranic calligraphy, to the architectural design   of mosques,   made infinity the cornerstone of its expression. While most art continued on a human centric pathway, culminating in the cult of the individual, Islamic art remained rooted to an interconnecte...