Skip to main content
The Artist’s Estate

A family friend Katja Neuburger who escaped to London from a concentration camp, briefly housed the well-known artist, Kurt Schwitters. She would rue the fact that she threw away so many of his drawings that he put in the bin, valued today at £ 10,000. 

Andy Warhol famously said "death can really make you look like a star" and “death means a lot of money, honey”. Sadeqain and Gulgee paintings and drawings became worth much more posthumously.  Even in the lifetime of an artist, he or she may have sold their works very inexpensively only to find they later increased greatly in value.

Art purchases are one of the more stable investments, as it is a tangible asset, especially when there is a transiting market. While the seller benefits, the artists rarely do.

In 1920 in France, a landmark law was enacted when the destitute family of French painter Millet, claimed a share in the resale of his work, The Angelus, which originally sold for $100 but 15 years after his death was sold for $ 150,000.  Droit de Suite  ensures a percentage is paid to the artist throughout his lifetime and to his heirs or estate after his death with each subsequent public sale. The percentages and duration varies from country to country, averaging 0.25 % for sales above $ 500,000 and upto 4% for lower prices. The EU legislated the Resale Rights Directive in 2006, but not every country has these laws.

Rembrandt, El Greco, Modigliani, Vermeer, Van Gogh and Gauguin died in poverty, but today their works fetch millions in auction houses. Picasso was the first savvy artist who managed the production and distribution of his art to ensure its high pricing and keep his collectors eagerly waiting.  He did not make a will, leaving 45,000 works and 7 heirs to battle out ownership. Henry Moore established a charitable foundation in his lifetime, becoming an employee with an annual salary. The majority of artists, such as Salvador Dali and Sadeqain , leave their artworks in disarray upon their death, often leading to forgeries.   In 2011, Bonhams sold a painting by Ahmed Parvez, who died in poverty in 1979, a year after receiving the President's Medal for Pride of Performance, for £20,400. One wonders if his wife, Reiko Isago Ahmed  or his son, Aleem Ishago Pervez  received any resale percentage.

Artist initiatives such as The Artists Legacy Foundation in California, advise on resale income and planning estates. Living artists increasingly have agents. Artists are advised to keep a record of their works as an authenticating document to pre-empt fakes; buyers are advised to maintain provenance keeping track of where the work was purchased with proof such as a gallery receipt. Professional galleries are required to inform the artist of the name and contact of the buyer who also agrees to inform the artist if he resells the artwork. This practice is avoided in Pakistan, as the galleries fear the artist will bypass the gallery once a collector is identified. One can only imagine the chaos the future holds for art documentation in Pakistan.

One often hears complaints about the high prices of art in Pakistan , but one has only to make a comparison with sportspersons, lawyers, movie stars, musicians to realize it is not an equitable position.

Seinfeld and his fellow actors, producers and investors earn millions each time old episodes are aired, as do other creative professionals such as musicians, songwriters, photographers, writers all of whom get the benefit of royalties. Sting earns $2000 a day in royalties from his song ‘Every Breath you take” because Puff Daddy appropriated part of the song for the chorus of ‘I’ll Be Missing You,’ without seeking permission. If he had he would have paid 25% instead of 100% to Sting.

Pakistan has Copyright Laws and Intellectual Property Rights Laws for creative works, but these can only benefit the creator when infringed rather than establishing a royalty or resale income.  

Too many Pakistani musicians, sportspersons and artists, end their lives in abject poverty. Resales of art, remakes of songs or reruns of films on Filmazia should result in a financial share for the original creators and performers, or their heirs. Forgotten ustads, actors and sportspersons go through the humiliation of asking for funds from arts councils or government, and charity institutions.  The Olympic medalist, Hussain Shah, left the country disappointed to become a boxing trainer in Japan.

In a  2011 Dawn report, the folk singer Zeenat Sheikh was seen begging in Thatta, which roused the government to award a lifetime grant of Rs 10,000 a month. In 2015, the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Directorate of Culture decided to pay a stipend of Rs30,000 per  month to 500 artists and singers in need.

Instead of relying on charity, these people who have contributed to their country image in so many ways and have encouraged new generations, deserve a system that enables them to retire reaping the benefits of the productive part of their careers.   

Durriya Kazi
September 13, 2017




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decorated Trucks of Pakistan

International Institute for Asian Studies / Association for Asian Studies / Asia Committee, European Science Foundation First International Convention of Asia Scholars Leeuenhorst Conference Centre, Noordwijkerhout , Netherlands , 25-28 June, 1998 Panel: “ Shaking the Tree: New Approaches to Asian Art” / Session: Decorated Transport Decorated Trucks of Pakistan Durriya Kazi June 1998. Karachi Meaning is always in process, what has been called “a momentary stop in a continuing flow of interpretations of interpretations”. This paper pauses at some facts and some observations about decorated trucks of Pakistan , a subject that has elicited tantalisingly few studies. Pakistan is often presented geographically and thus historically as the corridor of land between the mountain passes that separated the near East from the plains of India . Less mentioned and more significant is its identity as the valley of the River Indus which has historically ...
  How Much is Enough? Most discussions about what is considered ‘enough’ centre around money and power. To be the most powerful, the wealthiest or the most famous, once the desire of mighty kings and despots, has now filtered down in modern societies, with rags to riches stories becoming commonplace. However, the modern world is increasingly characterised by insatiability, an inability to say “enough is enough”, and an insatiable desire for more money or power. Enough means having enough to live, enough to be happy, and enough to thrive. So how does one arrive at what is enough? Enough is not a number. Individuals have their own measure of enough. The wise know what that limit is, for others, society’s limiting systems — legal or moral — determine when enough is enough. King Ashoka won a battle against the Kalinga kingdom, with 100,000 deaths and even more taken captive. That was his ‘enough’. Appalled by his own ruthlessness, Ashoka became a Buddhist, dedicated to spreading th...
  ‘o Travelling Together or Going Our Separate Ways We live, and have lived for centuries, in a politically and economically divided world.   Unable to accept these differences, there is always one group that takes the further step of dominating another. The most direct way is for a stronger group to take over a weaker group by sheer force. Where the two forces are equally matched, subterfuge, divide et imperia – divide and rule, is effective. Sometimes all it takes is cultural seduction. Something as innocuous as blue jeans became an important symbol of the Free West during the Cold War. Bruce Springsteen told the East Berlin youth in a July 1988 concert “I’m not here for any government. I’ve come to play rock ‘n’ roll for you in the hope that one day all the barriers will be torn down.”   History books are filled with the constant constructing and dismantling of alliances, based on the perceived enemy of the moment. All the great wars in Europe, India and China ...