Skip to main content

 

How Freedom was Won

 

India was no stranger to invaders, both external, and internal, as many kingdoms vied with one another for territory and power. The invaders adopted the sub-continent as their home, contributing culturally and economically. The Mughal empire was producing about 25% of the world's economy.

By contrast the British colonial enterprise, which began with a foothold by the East India Company in Surat in 1607, until its reluctant departure in 1947, drained India of its wealth for the benefit of the British economy, leaving it in poverty, and social and political turmoil.

 A few thousand British officers subjugated a country of 300 million for more than 200 years. They protected their presence with military might, a police force, inventing laws, and establishing social authority. Ironically, the army and police were inducted from the local population, to imprison, execute or open fire on their fellow countrymen. Amitav Ghosh writes “How do you fight an enemy who fights with neither enmity nor anger but in submission to orders from superiors, without protest and without conscience?”

The native population was bewitched by Colonial pomp and circumstance, outdoing maharajahs with their own magnificent durbars, splendid military uniforms, formal tailcoats and ballgowns, and law courts with judges in formidable wigs. An opaque administration with complicated red tape kept the local population going from office to office to get approvals. Imposing official buildings and churches in European architectural styles transformed cities. The educated were no longer defined by their knowledge of Sanskrit, Persian or Arabic, but by an English education, and the cultivation of European etiquette, only to become an object of ridicule for not getting it right, as Lord Curzon has amusingly recorded in his notebooks.  

The princely states were traditionally militaristic, offering hazari ( 1000) or panjhazari ( 5000) troops to the Emperor. The East India Company, and later the British Crown, offered their own military, appointed Residents in each state who ‘advised’ on and monitored all state business. Their approval was necessary in appointing an heir and even marriages. With not enough officers to manage all of India, the princely states were enlisted to keep their people in check. Allowed their lavish lifestyles, they were left competing for the number of gun salutes.  

It is all the more remarkable that the populace rose up, faced imprisonments, executions, and harsh suppression of every uprising. There are varying estimates of deaths ranging from 35 million to 100 million. 

The many peasant rebellions, such as the Santhal Rebellions of 1883, grew out of harsh taxation, confiscation of lands, closure of industries to create markets for British made goods, trapping people in a cycle of poverty and loss of dignity.  Great Battles were fought by Siraj ud Daulah, Tipu Sultan, Hazrat Mahal and Rani Lakshmi Bai, and the 1857 rebellion by the troops. All were ruthlessly crushed.

The 20th Century saw more organized resistance in the Swadeshi Movement, The Khilafat Movement and Non-Cooperation Movement, The Civil Disobedience Movement, The Quit India Movement and the Naval Mutiny. One of the first Quit India calls was made in the Sindh Times in 1884, 58 years before Gandhi’s call. The Congress and All India Muslim League, the Khudai Khidmatgar, bold journalism, and inspiring poetry and anthems spread the resistance far and wide.  

Non- cooperation created the first mass movement. Many civil servants resigned, and British cloth was burnt publicly.   Men, women and the youth came out in great numbers. Mass detentions with 100,000 arrests, fines, and public flogging merely sent leaders underground, broadcasting messages over clandestine radios, and distributing pamphlets, keeping intelligence agencies busy.

When 14 year-old Fatima Sughra replaced the Union Jack at the Lahore Civil Secretariat with the All-India Muslim League flag in 1947, it was on the back of 200 years of courageous resistance.

 

Durriya Kazi

April 8, 2023

Karachi

durriyakazi1918@gmail.com

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

https://theconversation.com/at-once-silent-and-eloquent-a-glimpse-of-pakistani-visual-poetry-70544 ‘At once silent and eloquent’: a glimpse of Pakistani visual poetry February 13, 2017 6.55pm AEDT Author Durriya Kazi Head of department Visual Studies, University of Karachi Disclosure statement Durriya Kazi does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the academic appointment above. Partners View all partners Republish this article Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence. Rickshaw poetry in Pakistan.  D.Kazi ,  CC BY-NC-ND   Email   Twitter 33   Facebook 239   LinkedIn 1  Print Whose mischief created a world of beseechers? Each petitioner is seen wearing a garment of paper This line from the famous Mughul poet  Ghalib  refers to what he claimed to be ancient Per
Art and the Swadeshi Movement In my quest to discover the origins of the exquisite tiles in my aunts’ home in Karachi’s old Amil Colony, I stumbled upon a whole new dimension of the Swadeshi, and later Swaraj, movement, an important rallying point for the Freedom Movement. Swaraj is commonly identified with Non-cooperation, Civil Disobedience, and political rallies. Behind the public bonfires of European cloth, manufacturers, designers, artists, poets and journalists quietly built factories, established presses, redesigned art school curricula that not only spread the spirit of revolution across India but ensured there were locally produced alternatives. Jamshed Nusserwanji established Bharat Tiles with Pheroze Sidhwa in 1922 in Bombay with a manufacturing branch in Karachi, as his swadeshi contribution, saying “India needs both economic and political independence”.     Developing a new process using coloured cements, the exquisite tiles we see in all heritage buildings i
  Fearless Gazelles of Islam Nusaybah bint Ka`b, seeing the Prophet ( PBUH) unprotected during the Battle of Uhud, ran to shield him with her sword alongside her husband and son. She received many wounds, and the Prophet himself (PBUH) said, wherever he turned, whether to the right or to the left, he saw her defending him. She was present at a number of battles, and at the age of 60 fought at Al-Yamamah, receiving 11 wounds, also losing her hand. When Khawla bint al-Azwar’s brother was taken captive by the Byzantines, she put on armour and charged into the Byzantine troops to rescue him. Taken captive at the Battle of Marj al Saffar, she fended off the Byzantines with a tentpole, killing seven. Muslim women were an important part of every battle rallying their men, or tending to the wounded, sometimes taking up arms or composing taunting poetry. Ghazala al-Haruriyya called out to the fleeing Umayyad General “You are a lion against me but were made into an ostrich which spreads it