Skip to main content

 

The Animal Kingdom

Native Americans believe the animal world teaches man how to live close to the earth, respectful of and in harmony with the natural world.

In the hierarchy of reincarnation, in both Hinduism and Buddhism, humans have the highest status. Being born an animal is the result of bad Karma in a previous life.  

All three Abrahamic religions – Judaism, Christianity and Islam believe man is the highest creation, which makes them responsible for the wellbeing of the earth and its creatures, and all prohibit cruelty to animals. Ecclesiastes 3:19 of the Old Testament says “man has no superiority over beast”. The Quran explains in Surah 6:38 that “all the creatures that crawl on the earth and those that fly with their wings are communities like yourselves.” All three believe animals have souls, and are to be valued as God’s creation. 

Whether they believe themselves to be superior to animals or not, humans have been fascinated by the animal kingdom.

Rudyard Kipling’s The Jungle Book (1894), Edgar Rice Burroughs’ Tarzan of the Apes, (1912) inspired an endless array of children’s stories.  By the time Disney cartoons made their appearance, the stories have only animal characters rather than the relationship of humans and animals.

The idea of animals standing in for humans is not a new one and can be traced back to the ancient Indian Panchatantra and Aesop’s fables ( 6th C BC ).  Using animals as metaphors allow the moral stories and messages to be less confrontational. 

Post Darwinian curiosity about the nature and behavior of animals grew with the founding of the National Geographic Society in 1888, now spread across the world through the Nat Geo Channel.

Hugh John Lofting wrote letters to his children from the British Army trenches of World War I, creating the much beloved Dr. Dolittle, a vet who can talk to animals. Along with the three films versions made, it seeded the idea that animals are not just a herd or a species, but have individual personalities.

Despite our love for animals, we destroy more and more of their habitat. The extinction of species such as the dinosaurs has been the result of natural phenomenon, but humans have speeded up the process through overhunting and encroaching their natural habitats. 

Modern zoos believe their role is to raise public awareness and develop breeding programmes, like a “Noah’s Ark”. However, the very worst place to see animals is in a zoo. No matter how big an enclosure, it cannot compare with the several thousand square miles an animal has in the wild.

Zoos have a dark history. Although private bestiaries were popular from Egyptian times, public zoos are a colonial legacy. Established to reflect European authority over distant lands, they were places of spectacle. Behind the collections, is the capture of animals taken from their community by wildlife traders - not unlike the capture of humans for slavery.

The 19th century pioneer of modern zoos, Carl Hagenbeck, captured animals in nearly every continent of the world to be exhibited in European cities, including humans “savages” - Nubians and Inuits. He trained animals for circuses in Europe and USA. To his credit he eventually realized zoo animals need natural surroundings not tiled cages.

Karachi Zoo was also established by colonialists in 1878. Dr Sohail Ansari had written an excellent history for Dawn. Dr A A Quraishy who was zoo curator from 1953 to 1983, established the Safari Park in 1970 intending to transfer the Zoo to this location - an unfulfilled dream. In the meantime, animals are humiliated daily in miserable enclosures, managed by indifferent staff, and visitors come away with little knowledge of the animals they have seen.

Margi Prideaux, in her article “Zoos are the problem, not the solution to animal conservation” writes zoos “are unable to accommodate more than the smallest fraction of the world’s 22,784 species that are threatened with extinction.” Do we need zoos when there are excellent animal documentaries? Is conservation not better served by nature preserves and rolling back the destruction of animal habitats?

 

Durriya Kazi

Karachi.

October 10, 2021

 durriyakazi1918@gmail.com

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

https://theconversation.com/at-once-silent-and-eloquent-a-glimpse-of-pakistani-visual-poetry-70544 ‘At once silent and eloquent’: a glimpse of Pakistani visual poetry February 13, 2017 6.55pm AEDT Author Durriya Kazi Head of department Visual Studies, University of Karachi Disclosure statement Durriya Kazi does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the academic appointment above. Partners View all partners Republish this article Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence. Rickshaw poetry in Pakistan.  D.Kazi ,  CC BY-NC-ND   Email   Twitter 33   Facebook 239   LinkedIn 1  Print Whose mischief created a world of beseechers? Each petitioner is seen wearing a garment of paper This line from the famous Mughul poet  Ghalib  refers to what he claimed to be ancient Per
Art and the Swadeshi Movement In my quest to discover the origins of the exquisite tiles in my aunts’ home in Karachi’s old Amil Colony, I stumbled upon a whole new dimension of the Swadeshi, and later Swaraj, movement, an important rallying point for the Freedom Movement. Swaraj is commonly identified with Non-cooperation, Civil Disobedience, and political rallies. Behind the public bonfires of European cloth, manufacturers, designers, artists, poets and journalists quietly built factories, established presses, redesigned art school curricula that not only spread the spirit of revolution across India but ensured there were locally produced alternatives. Jamshed Nusserwanji established Bharat Tiles with Pheroze Sidhwa in 1922 in Bombay with a manufacturing branch in Karachi, as his swadeshi contribution, saying “India needs both economic and political independence”.     Developing a new process using coloured cements, the exquisite tiles we see in all heritage buildings i
  Fearless Gazelles of Islam Nusaybah bint Ka`b, seeing the Prophet ( PBUH) unprotected during the Battle of Uhud, ran to shield him with her sword alongside her husband and son. She received many wounds, and the Prophet himself (PBUH) said, wherever he turned, whether to the right or to the left, he saw her defending him. She was present at a number of battles, and at the age of 60 fought at Al-Yamamah, receiving 11 wounds, also losing her hand. When Khawla bint al-Azwar’s brother was taken captive by the Byzantines, she put on armour and charged into the Byzantine troops to rescue him. Taken captive at the Battle of Marj al Saffar, she fended off the Byzantines with a tentpole, killing seven. Muslim women were an important part of every battle rallying their men, or tending to the wounded, sometimes taking up arms or composing taunting poetry. Ghazala al-Haruriyya called out to the fleeing Umayyad General “You are a lion against me but were made into an ostrich which spreads it