Skip to main content

Curbing Cultural Exchange 

There are 195 countries in the world today. There was a time when the word “country” meant the countryside, the area surrounding a walled city. Civilization and Empire are words used to describe those political and cultural identities whose expanses of power or authority had ever changing boundaries.  Today’s “Country” is a political term used to describe a territory with well-defined and heavily protected borders.

Countries or nation states, emerged with the growth of capitalist economies, the Age of Discovery when the competition between monarchs for discovering new lands and trade rights, led to the formal demarcation of kingdoms and realms. As Ali Khan writes in his paper “Extinction of Nation States”, the King of the French became King of France.  

In the 16 C the Dutch jurist, Hugo Grotius, developed the idea of territorial sovereignty which became the framework for the modern nation state.  Eurocentric colonialism and global economic systems imposed this model across the world. 

Gradually each country established a uniform culture as a matter of State policy. State languages were imposed, centralized laws governed every aspect of people’s lives, national flags and anthems were created and national armies fiercely guard the borders.

The great casualty of this defining of borders has been the free dissemination and exchange of knowledge and cultures. Just looking at two sources that have benefitted the world that are inconceivable in today’s political climate, the Silk Route and the Islamic Empire, we realize how much we have lost.

From the 2 BC to the 15th century when sea trade  became organized, the Silk route  connected China, the Mediterranean and Africa and everything in between.  Along this route traders, travelers, missionaries and adventurers, exchanged goods, shared discoveries, cultures, languages, and philosophies. Apart from silk which was a guarded secret until a 6C Christian monk smuggled caterpillar eggs into Byzantine , there was a free transfer of knowledge.  From China came silk, porcelain, the art of casting iron, gunpowder, alchemy, papermaking, printing with moveable type,  Chinese medicine and acupuncture, clock-making, the compass, and of course tea.  China itself acquired a taste for Indian sandalwood, Persian  saffron and pistachios, Egyptian glass and horses from Ferghana. Craftsmen and scientists  from Europe, were invited to China to  share their skills on ambitious projects. Buddhism, Christianity and Islam entered China through the silk route. 

The Muslim Empire was even more generous as  it did not aim to enrich Makkah or Medina, but to enrich the lands they settled in.  A unique borderless empire,  scholars, Sufis, scientists, administrators,  artists and craftsmen considered the entire dar-ul Islam as home. They generously shared their discoveries and transferred knowledge they had acquired to any seeker, Muslim or non-Muslim.  They preserved and built upon the philosophy and sciences of the Greeks and Indians, through  translations  and established  libraries. Indian numerals and the concept of zero, Chinese papermaking, navigational aids, medicine, sciences, international law,  urban planning, the concept of hospitals, structures of music and  musical instruments, architecture  and literature, and innumerable inventions,  inspired Europe to modernize.

Today travel and the exchange of knowledge and cultures is restricted by visas, copyright, or hefty university fees.  The internet is the closest instrument for the free universal right to knowledge but  is subtly managed and restricted by search engines. Marco Polo or Ibn Batutta would find this a strange world. 

Seekers of a better life take perilous journeys across mountains or seas only to face hostility.  The unrestricted dissemination of knowledge and goods is left to underground networks of havala, khepias, smugglers, code crackers, and hackers, who perhaps will one day be considered heroes.

Durriya Kazi
15 April 2019
.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

https://theconversation.com/at-once-silent-and-eloquent-a-glimpse-of-pakistani-visual-poetry-70544 ‘At once silent and eloquent’: a glimpse of Pakistani visual poetry February 13, 2017 6.55pm AEDT Author Durriya Kazi Head of department Visual Studies, University of Karachi Disclosure statement Durriya Kazi does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the academic appointment above. Partners View all partners Republish this article Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence. Rickshaw poetry in Pakistan.  D.Kazi ,  CC BY-NC-ND   Email   Twitter 33   Facebook 239   LinkedIn 1  Print Whose mischief created a world of beseechers? Each petitioner is seen wearing a garment of paper This line from the famous Mughul poet  Ghalib  refers to what he claimed to be ancient Per
Art and the Swadeshi Movement In my quest to discover the origins of the exquisite tiles in my aunts’ home in Karachi’s old Amil Colony, I stumbled upon a whole new dimension of the Swadeshi, and later Swaraj, movement, an important rallying point for the Freedom Movement. Swaraj is commonly identified with Non-cooperation, Civil Disobedience, and political rallies. Behind the public bonfires of European cloth, manufacturers, designers, artists, poets and journalists quietly built factories, established presses, redesigned art school curricula that not only spread the spirit of revolution across India but ensured there were locally produced alternatives. Jamshed Nusserwanji established Bharat Tiles with Pheroze Sidhwa in 1922 in Bombay with a manufacturing branch in Karachi, as his swadeshi contribution, saying “India needs both economic and political independence”.     Developing a new process using coloured cements, the exquisite tiles we see in all heritage buildings i
  Fearless Gazelles of Islam Nusaybah bint Ka`b, seeing the Prophet ( PBUH) unprotected during the Battle of Uhud, ran to shield him with her sword alongside her husband and son. She received many wounds, and the Prophet himself (PBUH) said, wherever he turned, whether to the right or to the left, he saw her defending him. She was present at a number of battles, and at the age of 60 fought at Al-Yamamah, receiving 11 wounds, also losing her hand. When Khawla bint al-Azwar’s brother was taken captive by the Byzantines, she put on armour and charged into the Byzantine troops to rescue him. Taken captive at the Battle of Marj al Saffar, she fended off the Byzantines with a tentpole, killing seven. Muslim women were an important part of every battle rallying their men, or tending to the wounded, sometimes taking up arms or composing taunting poetry. Ghazala al-Haruriyya called out to the fleeing Umayyad General “You are a lion against me but were made into an ostrich which spreads it