Skip to main content
The Artist’s Estate

A family friend Katja Neuburger who escaped to London from a concentration camp, briefly housed the well-known artist, Kurt Schwitters. She would rue the fact that she threw away so many of his drawings that he put in the bin, valued today at £ 10,000. 

Andy Warhol famously said "death can really make you look like a star" and “death means a lot of money, honey”. Sadeqain and Gulgee paintings and drawings became worth much more posthumously.  Even in the lifetime of an artist, he or she may have sold their works very inexpensively only to find they later increased greatly in value.

Art purchases are one of the more stable investments, as it is a tangible asset, especially when there is a transiting market. While the seller benefits, the artists rarely do.

In 1920 in France, a landmark law was enacted when the destitute family of French painter Millet, claimed a share in the resale of his work, The Angelus, which originally sold for $100 but 15 years after his death was sold for $ 150,000.  Droit de Suite  ensures a percentage is paid to the artist throughout his lifetime and to his heirs or estate after his death with each subsequent public sale. The percentages and duration varies from country to country, averaging 0.25 % for sales above $ 500,000 and upto 4% for lower prices. The EU legislated the Resale Rights Directive in 2006, but not every country has these laws.

Rembrandt, El Greco, Modigliani, Vermeer, Van Gogh and Gauguin died in poverty, but today their works fetch millions in auction houses. Picasso was the first savvy artist who managed the production and distribution of his art to ensure its high pricing and keep his collectors eagerly waiting.  He did not make a will, leaving 45,000 works and 7 heirs to battle out ownership. Henry Moore established a charitable foundation in his lifetime, becoming an employee with an annual salary. The majority of artists, such as Salvador Dali and Sadeqain , leave their artworks in disarray upon their death, often leading to forgeries.   In 2011, Bonhams sold a painting by Ahmed Parvez, who died in poverty in 1979, a year after receiving the President's Medal for Pride of Performance, for £20,400. One wonders if his wife, Reiko Isago Ahmed  or his son, Aleem Ishago Pervez  received any resale percentage.

Artist initiatives such as The Artists Legacy Foundation in California, advise on resale income and planning estates. Living artists increasingly have agents. Artists are advised to keep a record of their works as an authenticating document to pre-empt fakes; buyers are advised to maintain provenance keeping track of where the work was purchased with proof such as a gallery receipt. Professional galleries are required to inform the artist of the name and contact of the buyer who also agrees to inform the artist if he resells the artwork. This practice is avoided in Pakistan, as the galleries fear the artist will bypass the gallery once a collector is identified. One can only imagine the chaos the future holds for art documentation in Pakistan.

One often hears complaints about the high prices of art in Pakistan , but one has only to make a comparison with sportspersons, lawyers, movie stars, musicians to realize it is not an equitable position.

Seinfeld and his fellow actors, producers and investors earn millions each time old episodes are aired, as do other creative professionals such as musicians, songwriters, photographers, writers all of whom get the benefit of royalties. Sting earns $2000 a day in royalties from his song ‘Every Breath you take” because Puff Daddy appropriated part of the song for the chorus of ‘I’ll Be Missing You,’ without seeking permission. If he had he would have paid 25% instead of 100% to Sting.

Pakistan has Copyright Laws and Intellectual Property Rights Laws for creative works, but these can only benefit the creator when infringed rather than establishing a royalty or resale income.  

Too many Pakistani musicians, sportspersons and artists, end their lives in abject poverty. Resales of art, remakes of songs or reruns of films on Filmazia should result in a financial share for the original creators and performers, or their heirs. Forgotten ustads, actors and sportspersons go through the humiliation of asking for funds from arts councils or government, and charity institutions.  The Olympic medalist, Hussain Shah, left the country disappointed to become a boxing trainer in Japan.

In a  2011 Dawn report, the folk singer Zeenat Sheikh was seen begging in Thatta, which roused the government to award a lifetime grant of Rs 10,000 a month. In 2015, the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Directorate of Culture decided to pay a stipend of Rs30,000 per  month to 500 artists and singers in need.

Instead of relying on charity, these people who have contributed to their country image in so many ways and have encouraged new generations, deserve a system that enables them to retire reaping the benefits of the productive part of their careers.   

Durriya Kazi
September 13, 2017




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

https://theconversation.com/at-once-silent-and-eloquent-a-glimpse-of-pakistani-visual-poetry-70544 ‘At once silent and eloquent’: a glimpse of Pakistani visual poetry February 13, 2017 6.55pm AEDT Author Durriya Kazi Head of department Visual Studies, University of Karachi Disclosure statement Durriya Kazi does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the academic appointment above. Partners View all partners Republish this article Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence. Rickshaw poetry in Pakistan.  D.Kazi ,  CC BY-NC-ND   Email   Twitter 33   Facebook 239   LinkedIn 1  Print Whose mischief created a world of beseechers? Each petitioner is seen wearing a garment of paper This line from the famous Mughul poet  Ghalib  refers to what he claimed to be ancient Per
Art and the Swadeshi Movement In my quest to discover the origins of the exquisite tiles in my aunts’ home in Karachi’s old Amil Colony, I stumbled upon a whole new dimension of the Swadeshi, and later Swaraj, movement, an important rallying point for the Freedom Movement. Swaraj is commonly identified with Non-cooperation, Civil Disobedience, and political rallies. Behind the public bonfires of European cloth, manufacturers, designers, artists, poets and journalists quietly built factories, established presses, redesigned art school curricula that not only spread the spirit of revolution across India but ensured there were locally produced alternatives. Jamshed Nusserwanji established Bharat Tiles with Pheroze Sidhwa in 1922 in Bombay with a manufacturing branch in Karachi, as his swadeshi contribution, saying “India needs both economic and political independence”.     Developing a new process using coloured cements, the exquisite tiles we see in all heritage buildings i
  Fearless Gazelles of Islam Nusaybah bint Ka`b, seeing the Prophet ( PBUH) unprotected during the Battle of Uhud, ran to shield him with her sword alongside her husband and son. She received many wounds, and the Prophet himself (PBUH) said, wherever he turned, whether to the right or to the left, he saw her defending him. She was present at a number of battles, and at the age of 60 fought at Al-Yamamah, receiving 11 wounds, also losing her hand. When Khawla bint al-Azwar’s brother was taken captive by the Byzantines, she put on armour and charged into the Byzantine troops to rescue him. Taken captive at the Battle of Marj al Saffar, she fended off the Byzantines with a tentpole, killing seven. Muslim women were an important part of every battle rallying their men, or tending to the wounded, sometimes taking up arms or composing taunting poetry. Ghazala al-Haruriyya called out to the fleeing Umayyad General “You are a lion against me but were made into an ostrich which spreads it