Skip to main content

 

In Defense of the Tangible

We are poised hesitantly before a future in which Artificial Intelligence (AI) and digital technology will be an integral part of our lives - decision making, production capabilities, education platforms, medical practice, warfare, business transactions, governance, policing and many more functions we cannot even anticipate.

Hesitant, because as Geoffrey Hinton, the "godfather of AI", warns, within the next five years AI could dominate our lives with more intelligence than humans and more alarmingly it can potentially make decisions independently of human instructions. He has worked on deep learning and Artificial Intelligence since the 70s, so his words carry weight.

Digital technology is already a part of our lives – on our phones, laptops and in our surroundings. We can walk through a Van Gogh painting, or among the dinosaurs in a museum and travel to distant places with virtual reality devices. Virtual Assistants, the ever-attentive Siri and Alexa in our homes, respond to our most trivial needs.

Its all very exciting. No more maps when trying to find the best route, no space consuming shelves full of books, no need to depend on others for information.

While digitizing, converting data to a digital form, is so essential to preserving books and images, digitalizing or using digitized data to create systems is a grey area. 

 Experiencing the world with our five senses is integral to being human, to feeling alive. We make sense of our experiences when the brain combines information from multiple sensory systems. Sight, hearing and touch have been digitised and it is claimed that smell and taste will soon be digitally available. It is difficult to not be sceptical of the ability of digital technology to truly replace real multisensory experience.

While it may work as a marketing tool it, it cannot capture the real experience of jostling through a bazaar, hot and tired, catching snippets of conversations, the weight of shopping bags cutting into the palms. The poet William Wordsworth would not have compared Lucy to “a violet by a mossy stone half hidden from the eye” if his walks in the woods were virtual.

Some experiences are personal and unique such as touching the rough stone of an old building, seeing a thumb print on a 4000 year old terracotta toy from Harappa, feeling a sudden breeze rustling through a tree, the smell of rain on parched earth.

Reading a book on Kindle is perfect for accessing the content of a book, but the sensation of turning a crisp page, feeling the weight of a hardbound book is absent. We can digitally access the art collections of museums. However, the experience of seeing brush marks on a Mondrian painting, or the scale of a Courbet painting cannot be imagined when seen as a uniformly sized image on a 17 inch or even a 40 inch computer screen. Learning to play the sitar by feeling the tension of its taut strings cannot be experienced with a synthesizer.   

The psychoanalyst, Erica Komisar emphasizes “there’s simply no real substitute for physical presence” especially in the first 1000 days of a child. Skin to skin contact with new born babies is recognised as the best way for parents to bond with their child.

Social media enables self-learning, makes it easy to contact friends or long-lost relatives online, especially for those who may be housebound.  On the other hand, real human interaction- the firmness of a handshake, an averted glance, a broad smile or eyes filling with tears, cannot be truly conveyed by the limited set of cartoon-like emojis. Augmented reality takes us to places we may never travel to, but it is on physical journeys that true learning takes place - interacting with people and landscapes, testing our endurance.  In real experiences thing go wrong, we lose our way only to discover parts of a city we never knew.

Human autonomy lies in balancing virtual and real experiences, with a larger proportion allocated to real experiences, making the difference between leading our lives or having them led for us.

The book ‘Tangible things: making history through objects’ studies the Harvard University collections of objects from iridescent beetles to things stored in a bottom drawer, each with a story that links the present to the past.

Future generations need to find our photo albums, our letters and notebooks, not stored in an inaccessible ‘cloud’, but in an old battered box. 

 

Duriya Kazi

November 4, 2024

Karachi

durriyakazi1918@gmail.com  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decorated Trucks of Pakistan

International Institute for Asian Studies / Association for Asian Studies / Asia Committee, European Science Foundation First International Convention of Asia Scholars Leeuenhorst Conference Centre, Noordwijkerhout , Netherlands , 25-28 June, 1998 Panel: “ Shaking the Tree: New Approaches to Asian Art” / Session: Decorated Transport Decorated Trucks of Pakistan Durriya Kazi June 1998. Karachi Meaning is always in process, what has been called “a momentary stop in a continuing flow of interpretations of interpretations”. This paper pauses at some facts and some observations about decorated trucks of Pakistan , a subject that has elicited tantalisingly few studies. Pakistan is often presented geographically and thus historically as the corridor of land between the mountain passes that separated the near East from the plains of India . Less mentioned and more significant is its identity as the valley of the River Indus which has historically ...
  ‘o Travelling Together or Going Our Separate Ways We live, and have lived for centuries, in a politically and economically divided world.   Unable to accept these differences, there is always one group that takes the further step of dominating another. The most direct way is for a stronger group to take over a weaker group by sheer force. Where the two forces are equally matched, subterfuge, divide et imperia – divide and rule, is effective. Sometimes all it takes is cultural seduction. Something as innocuous as blue jeans became an important symbol of the Free West during the Cold War. Bruce Springsteen told the East Berlin youth in a July 1988 concert “I’m not here for any government. I’ve come to play rock ‘n’ roll for you in the hope that one day all the barriers will be torn down.”   History books are filled with the constant constructing and dismantling of alliances, based on the perceived enemy of the moment. All the great wars in Europe, India and China ...
  How Much is Enough? Most discussions about what is considered ‘enough’ centre around money and power. To be the most powerful, the wealthiest or the most famous, once the desire of mighty kings and despots, has now filtered down in modern societies, with rags to riches stories becoming commonplace. However, the modern world is increasingly characterised by insatiability, an inability to say “enough is enough”, and an insatiable desire for more money or power. Enough means having enough to live, enough to be happy, and enough to thrive. So how does one arrive at what is enough? Enough is not a number. Individuals have their own measure of enough. The wise know what that limit is, for others, society’s limiting systems — legal or moral — determine when enough is enough. King Ashoka won a battle against the Kalinga kingdom, with 100,000 deaths and even more taken captive. That was his ‘enough’. Appalled by his own ruthlessness, Ashoka became a Buddhist, dedicated to spreading th...