Skip to main content
IMRAN MIR - THE SOUNDS OF SILENCE
 ~Durriya Kazi

I never made a painting as a work of art, it’s all research.
~ Pablo Picasso

“I have never been and never will be a product of anything more than myself. My art is my own, why bother stating something about my art that isn’t true?”
~ Alexander Calder

What you see is what you see. ~ Imran Mir

Throughout his career as an artist Imran Mir has remained true to the notion of Art as investigation. He set out on this journey in 1973 while still an art student with his “First Paper” as he chose to call each body of work to the latest “Eleventh Paper” of 2013. Art investigation, unlike the scientific method, sets out without any attempt to visualize the final outcome of the work which may be unexpected and surprising even for the artist. He travels on a craft of intuition, or by initiating a system that will unfold according to its own internal logic.

The process necessitates stringently avoiding pictorial referential work, developing a grammar of lines and shapes that do not derive from nature, planes, lines, curves, volumes and their interaction arriving at, as Gabo states, “ space as an entity in itself, not tied to a familiar object” to a “ more cosmic involvement between space and reality” ( Elsen)

A number of terms emerged from modernist and minimalist art to describe art that aimed to reach beyond what they saw as distractions of pictoriality to reach the innermost essence of things:  Systems Art, Seriel Art, Process art  producing work as varied as Pollack’s drip paintings, Frank Stella and Sol LeWitt’s ‘structures’and diagrammatic drawings, Daniel Buren’s ‘degree-zero’ painting intended to be anonymous non metaphorical self referential works focusing on ‘the visuality of painting’.  

Mir’s work shares some of these methodologies and premises, however he ventures even further into the unknown by relinquishing premise altogether   “My work is a statement but I am not sure what the statement is”.
In this sense it may be more accurate to describe his process as generative - initiating a system into motion and allowing it to follow its own trajectory

The brothers Naum Gabo and Nikolai Pevsner in their Realistic Manifesto1920 announced “ we acknowledge the line only as the direction of static forces that are hidden in the objects, and of their rhythms.” 

And

“The plumb line in our hand, eyes as precise as a ruler, in a spirit as taut as a compass.. we construct our works as the universe constructs its own, as the engineer constructs his bridges, as the mathematician his formula of the orbits.”

Meaning emanates through the process of creative expression, a process that is apparently self organizing, transiting between order and disorder, hinting at fractals. 

As someone who has followed Imran Mir’s works for many years now, despite his reluctance to concede to any interpretation of his work, the complete submission to intuition, gives his work a spiritual almost sufi dimension that is mesmerizing.

By choosing  a monumental scale for his works he further envelopes the viewer within the experience of powerful silence and the still centre of metaphysical movement. It is like contemplating the firmament knowing all is in motion but being acutely aware of the stillness. This is especially evident in Mir’s later works -  the Tenth and Eleventh papers and the in progress Twelfth Paper.

Scale is important to Mir’s work. Inherited from the impact of modernist works especially Rothko, whose work affected him deeply. But it is also a personal quality of being able to think expansively as a visionary in all he undertakes  whether his design practice or the construction of his home and studio.  His journey from the Central Institute of Arts and Crafts, Karachi  to the vast continent of Canada and USA would itself have been a self expanding experience. Toronto, where he studied and New York which he visited regularly, seeing iconic artworks in museums and galleries, is in itself a journey through the layers of time and space.   

1976, the year of Mir’s graduation from OCAD was also the year the tallest structure in the world at the time, Toronto’s CN tower was completed.  It would have been a spectacular event. Mir says he and his fellow students and teachers regularly visited it during construction which coincidentally began when he first arrived in Toronto in 1973.  The sheer scale of it must have been inspiring and it is tempting to imagine it may have contributed to the sense of monumentality in Mir’s work.

While Mir sees himself as a painter, he has always made sculptures alongside his painting practice.  It is not all that surprising. His paintings have a sculptural and architectural quality and his sculptures seem to emerge or spring out from his canvases almost as a necessity.  As early as the Third Paper, Mir’s investigation of the rectangular grid transformed into a three dimensional  installation of stacked boxes.  The sculptures in turn inform the paintings as the surface pulls back spatially culminating in the architectural landscapes of the Seventh Paper.In the Tenth Paper, Mir extracts into real space, more literally, a coil of  wire, almost as if the work insisted itself into real space.  The paintings themselves have a tactile presence. Visiting his gallery with the afternoon light slanting shadows of sculpture onto painting, seeing painting filtered through the grid of sculpture, the relationship of one to the other becomes more poetic. 

The diagrammatic circles that emerged in the Sixth Paper transform into intensely worked full bodied spheres on canvas and from there into two large orbs made up of empty medicine bottles. The sculptures have a playful, witty quality about them unlike the more austere spirituality of the paintings. The sculptures allow Mir to play more whimsically with concepts he has discovered in the course of his investigative paintings. A painting with a bicycle pump  elaborates into a hybrid nautical assemblage of  steeI  orbs, supposedly activated into motion by an antique ship bellows.  Blue painted steel  cubes come tumbling out of  a red ring, a set of faux industrial  devices  with handles implying the activation of spheres or generating bubbles of painted steel.  

Whimsicality not withstanding, the sculptures share with the paintings an inherent theme of implied motion.  Where the paintings hint at a cosmic ‘gardish’ or movement, the sculptures through the devices of handles and pumps  suggest an invitation to awaken in the viewer  a curiosity and urge to  set the works in motion, to be participatory. 

Virtual movement or apparent movement has been explored in all art movements from the Discoblus,to the dynamic propulsion of Russian constructivism’s Tatlin or Archipenko.  Mir’s work is less about heroic activation but more about a contemplative observation closer to Pollock’s drip paintings, Calder’s Stabiles  or Jasper Johns target paintings and sculpture,  but infinitely quieter, shadowing the secret circling of the universe or the laws of physics. These are sensory pieces with loud primary colours which are used  not reductively but to restrict any referential interpretations, and the promise of the sound of mechanical movement.

In the recent body of work, sculpture is no longer  an extension of the investigative paintings,  but their own raison d’etre.  Imran Mir’s studios are spilling with new works, some wrapped up, some displayed. In between lie his organized workstations like oases.  The collective body of work appears to be a prolific and rapid conversation or dialogue between the paintings and the sculptures until the one becomes the other: The sculptures get painted, the paintings carry fugitive shadows made by the sculptures. The studio is like a Tesla laboratory, the stillness waiting to transform into kinetic energy. 

Karachi March 2014




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decorated Trucks of Pakistan

International Institute for Asian Studies / Association for Asian Studies / Asia Committee, European Science Foundation First International Convention of Asia Scholars Leeuenhorst Conference Centre, Noordwijkerhout , Netherlands , 25-28 June, 1998 Panel: “ Shaking the Tree: New Approaches to Asian Art” / Session: Decorated Transport Decorated Trucks of Pakistan Durriya Kazi June 1998. Karachi Meaning is always in process, what has been called “a momentary stop in a continuing flow of interpretations of interpretations”. This paper pauses at some facts and some observations about decorated trucks of Pakistan , a subject that has elicited tantalisingly few studies. Pakistan is often presented geographically and thus historically as the corridor of land between the mountain passes that separated the near East from the plains of India . Less mentioned and more significant is its identity as the valley of the River Indus which has historically ...
  ‘o Travelling Together or Going Our Separate Ways We live, and have lived for centuries, in a politically and economically divided world.   Unable to accept these differences, there is always one group that takes the further step of dominating another. The most direct way is for a stronger group to take over a weaker group by sheer force. Where the two forces are equally matched, subterfuge, divide et imperia – divide and rule, is effective. Sometimes all it takes is cultural seduction. Something as innocuous as blue jeans became an important symbol of the Free West during the Cold War. Bruce Springsteen told the East Berlin youth in a July 1988 concert “I’m not here for any government. I’ve come to play rock ‘n’ roll for you in the hope that one day all the barriers will be torn down.”   History books are filled with the constant constructing and dismantling of alliances, based on the perceived enemy of the moment. All the great wars in Europe, India and China ...
  How Much is Enough? Most discussions about what is considered ‘enough’ centre around money and power. To be the most powerful, the wealthiest or the most famous, once the desire of mighty kings and despots, has now filtered down in modern societies, with rags to riches stories becoming commonplace. However, the modern world is increasingly characterised by insatiability, an inability to say “enough is enough”, and an insatiable desire for more money or power. Enough means having enough to live, enough to be happy, and enough to thrive. So how does one arrive at what is enough? Enough is not a number. Individuals have their own measure of enough. The wise know what that limit is, for others, society’s limiting systems — legal or moral — determine when enough is enough. King Ashoka won a battle against the Kalinga kingdom, with 100,000 deaths and even more taken captive. That was his ‘enough’. Appalled by his own ruthlessness, Ashoka became a Buddhist, dedicated to spreading th...